<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://blogg.de/css/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >
<channel>
<title>Find best cigarettes online</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/</link>
<description>Best cigarettes store online. All about cigarettes, tobacco, smoking brands.</description>
<language>de</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:16:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>blogg.de</generator>
<managingEditor>rss@blogg.de</managingEditor>
<webMaster>webmaster@blogg.de</webMaster>
<item>
<title>Cultural Adaptation of Evidenced-Based Treatments for Special Populations</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=62</link>
<description><![CDATA[The next step for research with underserved smokers is to consider cultural adaptation of EBTs, as very few trials have been conducted with the groups listed in Table 1. Cultural adaptation<br />involves any modification of an EBT’s design, treatment components, approach to delivery, or nature of the therapeutic relationship in order to accommodate the cultural beliefs, values, attitudes, and behaviors of the target population (Hawkins, Kreuter, Resnicow, Fishbein, &amp; Dijkstra, 2008). The historical, environmental,<br />and social forces that influence the target population should also be<br />taken into account during the cultural adaptation process (Resnicow, Soler, Braithwaite, Ahluwalia, &amp; Butler, 2000). In this special section, one article used key values of the Latino population to culturally adapt a theory-based smoking cessation treatment (Borrelli et al., 2010), and another article evaluated whether African American smokers respond to an evidenced-based smoking cessation intervention without any ethnocultural modifications<br />
 <br /><br /> Typically, cultural adaptation is a process that is applied to the<br />adaption of EBTs for different racial and ethnic groups, but this<br />application may be too narrow. Many of the groups listed in Table<br />1, like those of different racial and ethnic categories, also differ<br />from the general population of smokers in that they experience<br />discrimination, have a disproportionate burden of tobacco-related<br />disease, and have norms and customs that serve both as risk factors<br />for smoking and as protective factors to facilitate quitting. For<br />example, smokers with mobility impairments experience discrimination,<br />and these feelings of social stigmatization should be considered<br />when designing interventions, as has been done in African<br />American smoking cessation interventions.<br />The nosology and process of cultural adaptation should be applied<br />more widely, outside the bounds of race and ethnicity.<br />There are arguments for and against special populations research.<br />On the one hand, critics contend that cultural adaptation is<br />cost inefficient and fear that it will produce an “endless proliferation<br />of adapted variants of EBTs for various clinical problems in<br />various target communities” (Lau, 2006, p. 296). On the other<br />hand, dissemination of EBTs without consideration of cultural<br />factors could lead to lower treatment participation, failed change<br />attempts, and disengagement from future change attempts, especially<br />among underserved populations who are already at high risk<br />for treatment failure. Treatment tailoring has been shown to increase<br />attention to the message, create more effortful processing,<br />and result in fewer counterarguments and greater perceived credibility<br />of the message (Hawkins et al., 2008).<br />Perhaps a middle ground is to establish a priori criteria to judge<br />whether an intervention should be adapted for a particular group of<br />underserved smokers in order to prevent unnecessary intervention<br />development for a myriad of groups (e.g., smokers with tattoos<br />who watch David Letterman and who are allergic to gluten). Lau<br />(2006) contended that cultural adaptation is indicated when there is<br />a reasonable threat of failure of an EBT and presented several<br />criteria by which to make this determination for parent management<br />intervention research. Table 2 presents an adaptation and<br />extension of these criteria for smoking cessation. A particular<br />population may not respond to an EBT for smoking cessation if<br />there are differences from the general population in (a) rates and<br />patterns of smoking, (b) the burden of tobacco-related health<br />diseases, (c) predictors of smoking behavior, (d) risk factors for<br />smoking, (e) protective factors that may aid quitting, (f) treatment<br />engagement (e.g., participation, attrition, adherence), (g) treatment<br />response, or (h) perceived social validity of the EBT (e.g., target<br />members view EBT strategies as relevant, helpful, or acceptable;<br />Lau, 2006). Table 2 displays these criteria and illustrates how they<br />can be applied to a special population of smokers (e.g., smokers<br />with mobility impairments) to justify the modification of an EBT.<br />Once it is determined that the group constitutes a “special<br />population” and that the population meets the criteria for<br />adaptation of EBTs , four phases of cultural adaptation<br />are proposed in order to help standardize the cultural<br />adaptation process and aid cross-study comparisons. In Phase 1 of<br />the cultural adaptation process, several methods are used to identify<br />the changes to the EBT that are necessary to achieve congruency<br />with the target population. Both quantitative and qualitative<br />data collection from the target population are used to help guide<br />changes in the intervention in terms of surface structure<br /><br /><br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:16:15 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=62</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=diesdas" ent:id="diesdas">diesdas</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/information">information</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarettes">cigarettes</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/news">news</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarette">cigarette</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/industry">industry</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/e-cigarettes">e-cigarettes</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/lay">lay</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>COMBATING TOBACCO USE IN MILITARY</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=61</link>
<description><![CDATA[The committee assessed current tobacco-use policies and practices in DoD, VA, and other organizations, such as Kaiser Permanente; addressed such issues as treatment, existing policies, programs, infrastructure, and special populations; and made recommendations for improving efforts. The committee was asked to focus on evidence-based tobacco-control programs and policies in its report and interpreted this to mean assessment of policies, programs,<br />and activities that used appropriate methods and whose results were published in widely accepted and used peer-reviewed journals. To evaluate the current policies and programs<br />systematically and provide guidance for future directions for tobacco control in VA and DoD, the committee first identified the evidence base that forms the best practices; in general, the<br />evidence base consists of successful programs and approaches used in the general US population.<br />The committee then determined whether DoD and VA were using those best practices or a similar approach. If not, the committee identified possible obstacles to their implementation and<br />made recommendations on how to overcome them from both a policy perspective and a programmatic perspective, including identification of who must implement the recommendations.<br />
 <br /><br /> Most tobacco-control specialists have a public-health orientation and focus on<br />
mechanisms to reduce tobacco use and its consequent health-care burden at the population level.<br />
They work to reduce or prevent tobacco use on a large scale—the national, state, or regional<br />
scale. Examples of effective population-scale policies and interventions include increasing the<br />
cost of tobacco products, bans and restrictions on tobacco use, reducing out-of-pocket costs for<br />
treatment of tobacco addiction, counteradvertising campaigns, telephone quit lines, and<br />
multicomponent smoking-cessation campaigns (VA, 2004). The focus of tobacco control is often<br />
different for health-care providers, who deal with nicotine dependence on an individual level.<br />
For example, they attempt to help soldiers or veterans who have smoked a pack of cigarettes a<br />
day for 10 years to quit. Their concerns are related to whether a person is receptive to the idea of<br />
quitting, whether the pharmacy carries the appropriate addiction therapies, and whether the<br />
person will go to the suggested counseling sessions. Tobacco-treatment specialists are also an<br />
integral component in the continuum of tobacco-control interventions. In addition to treatment,<br />
there is a need for system change at the local level to enact program changes that will increase<br />
the likelihood of health providers helping users to quit. Local program change implies culture<br />
change and requires strong leadership; clear patient, staff, and environmental goals; strategic<br />
plans that include specific objectives and tactics; and policies to promote the sustainability of the<br />
change efforts.<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:34:10 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=61</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=recht" ent:id="recht">recht</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/use">use</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/military">military</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>R.J. Reynolds second quarter</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=60</link>
<description><![CDATA[“During the second quarter, we were better able to evaluate how the April 1 federal excise tax increases on tobacco products would impact our operating companies,” she said.<br />Based on those factors and on RAI’s first-half results, the company now expects full-year adjusted EPS, which excludes trademark impairments, in the range of $4.40 to $4.60, compared with its previous guidance of $4.15 to $4.45.<br />Ivey also noted that in the second quarter:<br />• R.J. Reynolds posted higher operating income, margin and total cigarette market share, with strong performance by its growth brands, <a href="http://www.cigarettesworld.com/camel-cigarette/" title="camel">Camel</a> and <a href="http://www.cigarettesworld.com/pall-mall-cigarette/" title="cigarettes">Pall Mall</a>; and,<br /><br /><br />
 <br /><br /> • Conwood delivered record moist-snuff volume and market share, with<br />
its powerful Grizzly brand capturing more than half of total category<br />
growth.<br /><br />
She added that the company’s Santa Fe subsidiary continues to gain volume and share on its Natural American Spirit brand.<br /><br />
R.J. Reynolds’ second-quarter operating income of $556 million was up<br />
3.4 percent over the prior-year period. That includes the impact of<br />
higher quarter-over-quarter pension expense of $45 million. The<br />
company’s operating margin of 28.2 percent was up 2 percentage points.<br /><br />
For the first half, adjusted operating income was $1.0 billion, which<br />
excludes trademark impairment charges of $377 million but includes<br />
higher pension expense of $90 million. Adjusted operating income was up<br />
5.3 percent, while adjusted operating margin of 27.9 percent was 3 full<br />
percentage points higher than the first half of 2008.<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:16:48 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=60</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=shopping" ent:id="shopping">shopping</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarettes">cigarettes</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/market">market</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/news">news</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>Policy implications in movies with tobacco</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=59</link>
<description><![CDATA[About half of youth smoking initiation in the US is attributed to exposure to movies with smoking. Cumulative exposure to all sorts of tobacco depictions in films predicts adolescent smoking initiation. Depictions of smoking by both “good<br />guys” and “bad guys” recruit new teen smokers.15 State tobacco control programs have allocated substantial resources to addressing this channel of recruitment. Since 2002, public health experts have pressed major studio distributors and their parent<br />companies to rate future films with smoking “R,” which would give producers and studios a market incentive to keep smoking out of future youth&#8208;rated films, and to adopt other measures to reduce health harm, such as certifying that productions are no longer taking payoffs from the tobacco industry<br />
 <br /><br /> In more than half of states with film subsidy programs (22/41), the film<br />subsidy program cap, appropriation or 2008 expenditure exceeded the state’s 2009<br />appropriation for tobacco prevention (Appendix A). For example, estimated on a<br />production&#8208;cost basis, New York State’s 30 percent film subsidies for four average<br />films from major studios or their affiliates will cost more than the state’s tobacco<br />control program ($72 million vs. $68 million). California’s new 20 percent tax credit, authorized at $100 million per year, exceeds its $78 million tobacco control budget<br />for 2009. At $90 million in awards, Connecticut’s film&#8208;video subsidy swamps that<br />state’s tobacco control funding by a ratio of more than ten to one. Georgia’s 2008<br />film subsidies surpass 2009 tobacco control spending by sixteen to one; in Illinois,<br />the ratio is four to one.<br />States subsidize most tobacco impressions on screen<br />The survey of 2008 films shows that states subsidize the tobacco impressions<br />most likely to reach and harm young people. That year, 68 percent (11.4 billion/<br />16.8 billion) of all tobacco impressions delivered to US theater audiences came from<br />youth&#8208;rated films. Films subsidized by a dozen US states delivered 71 percent (8.1<br />billion/11.4 billion) of these youth&#8208;rated impressions, the balance coming from USdeveloped<br />films shot in other countries.<br />Nearly half (8.1 billion/16.8 billion) of all tobacco impressions delivered to<br />US theater audiences in 2008 by films of all ratings came from youthrated<br />films<br />made in the US and eligible for state subsidies. Seventy&#8208;two percent (12.1 billion/<br />16.8 billion) of all tobacco impressions from both youthrated<br />and Rrated<br />films<br />were delivered by films shot in states now offering production subsidies<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:57:15 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=59</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=film" ent:id="film">film</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarette">cigarette</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/news">news</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoke">smoke</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/marlboro">marlboro</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/info">info</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/film">film</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/movies">movies</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gradually Diminishing Thoughts and Urges</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=58</link>
<description><![CDATA[During early recovery, periods of challenge may at times felt overwhelming. But<br />
hurricane force winds are now long gone. Still, it is entirely normal during the first<br />
couple of years to still be having thoughts of wanting and even encounter remote,<br />
seasonal or infrequent nicotine feeding cues. They may be associated with uncommon<br />
events such as relationships ending, crossing paths with an old friend, the birth of a baby,<br />
a wedding receptions or even death. <br /><br /> It is possible to retain romantic thoughts about using, thoughts capable of fostering urge<br />
and desire for as long as our mind is able to concentrate and focus upon them. While<br />
most will be quick stiff breezes a few may claim the status of storms.<br />
The beauty of recovery is that with each passing day the frequency, duration and intensity<br />
of challenge is &quot;generally&quot; on the decline. But like trying to watch a rose bud open,<br />
seeing the decline while living it can at times seem nearly impossible. Before we know it<br />
the storms turn to breezes and then to a guest now and then.<br />
One of the most popular discussions at WhyQuit’s peer support group Freedom is<br />
entitled, “Tell a newbie how many seconds a day you still want a cigarette.&quot; Below are<br />
representative entries made during 2008. The opening time period is how long the person<br />
has remained nicotine-free:<br />
· 2 months, 26 days: “once every two weeks for about 3-5 minutes.” Diane<br />
· 3 years, 3 months: “a few times in the past year the thought of smoking crossed<br />
my mind.” Joseph<br />
· 1 year, 3 months: “zip, zero, nada!” Melrose<br />
· 4 years: “How many seconds a year? None!!!” Laura<br />
· 2 years: “I never thought I could stop smoking or that I would completely stop<br />
220 Freedom from Nicotine<br />
thinking about cigarettes – but I have and its wonderful!” Sally<br />
· 7 years, 3 weeks: “My family smokes. I never desire it even if they’re around me<br />
smoking.” Anne<br />
· 1 year, 4 months: “I think about having one on what probably amounts to about 6<br />
seconds a week!” Annies1<br />
· 3 years, 1 month: “nul, nix, none, nothing, zip, zero … honestly, my nicotinerelated<br />
thoughts are annoyance at the smell of cigarettes if I can’t avoid it.” Meg<br />
· 2 months, 14 days: “Maybe 3-5 seconds every couple of days. Seriously, it does<br />
get so much easier.” Beth<br />
· 2 months: “…thought a few times of having a smoke but it’s a passing thought<br />
now, it has little strength.” Dave T<br />
· 5 months, 2 weeks: “I sometimes get hooked into a romantic thought about<br />
smoking, a memory, but it is merely a thought and not a desire or a need or a<br />
want.” Moira<br />
· 7 months, 2 weeks: “Never a want, need or crave … Passing thought? Maybe a<br />
couple times a week.” RJW<br />
· 2 years, 1 month: “I never think of smoking really. I think I had a fleeting thought<br />
one spring day when I was having a glass of wine and standing on the deck.” Jeff<br />
· 4 years: “I never think about smoking, except the occasional wish for a friend or<br />
acquaintance to know the peace that comes with never taking another puff.”<br />
Kevin<br />
· 4 months, 2 weeks: “…maybe six or seven seconds of “thoughts” a week. I’m<br />
one very happy camper.” Pat<br />
· 18 days: “Probably about 4 minutes thinking about it, maybe 30 seconds with a<br />
bit of an empty feeling, craving something that might be nicotine.” Maisie<br />
· 67 days: thoughts have completely dropped off to random, fleeting, a spit second<br />
if I choose to notice them. Occasionally, there is a new trigger but relatively easy<br />
to deal with no that I’m no longer struggling.” Ilona<br />
· 2 months, 12 days: “I only think about cigarettes on the weekend at a nightclub,<br />
then a smoker stands next to me and I have to move because it smells so bad.”<br />
Rochelle<br />
· 32 days: I work with smokers and dippers all day. Every time I saw someone<br />
smoking I would think Hmm ... time for a smoke and actually go for my pocket to<br />
get one out and then remember- I can't! This went on for the first two weeks and I<br />
was wondering if this was how it was going to be for me forever. I had smoked a<br />
pack plus a day for 30 years it was so much a part of my life that I figured I would<br />
always feel the urge to smoke when I saw someone else smoke. After the 2nd<br />
week I was feeling much more confident and determined and when I thought<br />
about smoking it was that I was sooo ... glad that I didn't anymore. Now after four<br />
weeks plus I think about smoking maybe 20 seconds a day and it’s never an urge<br />
to smoke, its a sense of something missing but not missed. The law of addiction is<br />
the first thing I think of when I think about smoking and I know that as long as I<br />
remember that I will Never Take Another Puff.” Ginz<br />
· 1 month, 1 hour: “It's still early in the recovery process so I'm not going to say I<br />
don't think about them...because I do, but in all honesty it's not really that much.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:25:14 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=58</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=lifestyle" ent:id="lifestyle">lifestyle</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/nicotine">nicotine</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoke">smoke</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarettes">cigarettes</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/addiction">addiction</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/city">city</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/europe">europe</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/food">food</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/friends">friends</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/new">new</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/party">party</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/people">people</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/usa">usa</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confronting alcohol related crave triggers</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=57</link>
<description><![CDATA[As mentioned, alcohol use is associated<br />
with roughly half of all relapses. It is an exception to the rule that we should try to<br />
quickly extinguish learned nicotine use associations.<br />
Regarding alcohol, it’s prudent to allow ourselves a few days to get our recovery legs<br />
under us and move past peak withdrawal before attempting to use it. Even then, due to<br />
diminished inhibitions, the smart move is to consider breaking drinking down into more<br />
manageable challenges that present fewer crave triggering cues. <br /><br /> Use associations between alcohol and nicotine can involve multiple cues. We may have<br />
nicotine use cues associated with entering a drinking location, sitting down, seeing<br />
alcohol containers, hearing ice cubes hit a glass or the sound of a bottle or can opening,<br />
picking up a drink, tasting that first swallow or beginning to sense the onset of alcohol’s<br />
inhibition diminishing effects.<br />
We may have developed nicotine-alcohol use associations where the use cue is<br />
encountering a drinking acquaintance, friend or another nicotine user, being around lots<br />
of other users, seeing ashtrays, cigarette packs and lighters within easy reach, seeing a<br />
cigarette machine or visible packs or cartons for sale behind the bar, or even sight of a jug<br />
filled with free matches. Use cues could be associated with engaging in conversation<br />
while drinking or having conversation shift gears into debate or argument after alcohol’s<br />
inhibition diminishing effects begin to be felt.<br />
Impaired judgment and diminished inhibitions may have established nicotine use cues<br />
associated with hearing music, feeling the beat, singing karaoke, dancing, flirting, fear,<br />
rejection, acceptance, partying, joy, sadness or beginning to feel drunk and turning to<br />
nicotine to stimulate the body’s nervous system.<br />
So how do we tackle alcohol-nicotine use associations? Consider the benefit of learning<br />
to use alcohol and extinguishing our primary alcohol-nicotine use associations in the<br />
safest environment available (usually our home), away from other potential use<br />
associations. Can you handle nicotine-free alcohol consumption when unaccompanied<br />
by other possible nicotine-alcohol use cues? If not, you may be facing alcohol<br />
dependency concerns as well. If so, the situation isn’t hopeless. Although entirely<br />
possible to arrest either dependency alone, research suggests that there is benefit in<br />
arresting co-dependencies at the same time]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:36:14 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=57</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=gesundheit" ent:id="gesundheit">gesundheit</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/industry">industry</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/products">products</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/information">information</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarettes">cigarettes</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/news">news</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigs">cigs</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/quit">quit</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/online">online</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>Emotional Recovery from smoking addictions</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=56</link>
<description><![CDATA[Feelings reflect emotional awareness or how we feel about the emotions stirring within us. The structure and function of these beautiful minds combine with instinctive, subconscious and conscious awareness to create an intuitive emotional richness that rivals the stars. Yet, if the only emotions remaining were those<br />untouched by our addiction, our mind’s unfeeling night sky would be empty and dark.<br />That isn’t to say that as nicotine addicts we didn’t have emotionally rich, full and meaningful lives. It means that to varying degrees and frequency, our addiction infected nearly all of our emotions. Rising and falling blood-serum levels of the psychoactive chemical nicotine impacted dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and glutamate.<br />Emotion can be broken down into three overlapping categories: (1) primary emotions, (2) secondary emotions and (3) background emotions.<br /><br /><br />
 <br /><br /> Primary emotions include surprise, fear, anger, joy, sadness and disgust.343 The<br /><br />
common thread is that each reflects an almost instant reaction as seen in facial<br /><br />
expressions, with no processing or routing inside the frontal lobe of the brain, the<br /><br />
seat of intelligence and thought.<br /><br />
Secondary emotions are all other emotions and result primarily from frontal lobe<br /><br />
and intellectual processing and analysis of the influence of primary emotions. A<br /><br />
truly dynamic being, although appearing as just a list of words, varying emotions<br /><br />
are the product of neuron and chemical interactions. Although not easy, while<br /><br />
reviewing the following list, reflect on how life as a nicotine addict may have<br /><br />
touched upon each.<br /><br />
<br />Our emotions range from accepting, affectionate, aggressive, agitated, aggravated,<br /><br />
alarmed, alert, amazed, amused, annoyed, anticipating, anxious, appreciated,<br /><br />
apprehensive, awed, bitter, blissful, bold, bored, bewildered, cautious, caring,<br /><br />
cheerful, compassionate, competent, composed, confused, constrained, contempt,<br /><br />
contented, cowardly, cruel, curious, courageous, defeated, dejected, delighted,<br /><br />
depressed, detached, disrespectful, distant, dreadful, disappointed, disgusted,<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:10:07 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=56</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=freizeit" ent:id="freizeit">freizeit</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarette">cigarette</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/news">news</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoke">smoke</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/marlboro">marlboro</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/info">info</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>Remove nicotine from blood plasma</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=55</link>
<description><![CDATA[A 2006 study found that drinking one liter of full-strength grapefruit juice (34 ounces or about 2 pints) will increase the rate by which the kidneys remove nicotine from blood plasma by 88%, as compared to when drinking 1 liter of water (231 milliliters of nicotine-free blood produced per minute using grapefruit juice vs. 123 milliliters of blood when drinking water).270 The study found that even if the grapefruit juice was halfstrength that nicotine’s renal clearance rate increased by 78% (219 milliliters per minute).<br />The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14 with 7 being neutral. The further below 7 a substance is, the greater its acidity. The higher a substance is above 7, the greater its alkalinity.<br /><br /><br />
 <br /><br /> According to the FDA,271 the below fluids have the following pH ranges:<br /><br />
· Cranberry juice 2.3 - 2.5<br /><br />
· Grapefruit juice 2.9 - 3.3<br /><br />
· Pineapple juice 3.3 - 3.6<br /><br />
· Orange juice 3.3 - 4.2<br /><br />
· Apple juice 3.4 - 4.0<br /><br />
· Prune juice 3.9 - 4.0<br /><br />
· Vegetable juice 3.9 - 4.3<br /><br />
· Tomato juice 4.1 - 4.6<br /><br />
· Milk 6.4 - 6.8<br /><br />
But don’t overdo it. Remember, our primary objective is to keep blood sugar as stable as<br /><br />
possible during the most challenging portion of recovery.<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:28:14 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=55</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=gesellschaft" ent:id="gesellschaft">gesellschaft</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/articles">articles</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/news">news</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarettes">cigarettes</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarette">cigarette</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>I smke for pleasure</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=54</link>
<description><![CDATA[“I smoke for pleasure.” Pleasure? It’s the Newport sales cry and it’s highly effective.<br />
Pleasure is defined as a state of gratification, a source of delight, satisfaction or joy.<br />
Tobacco industry store marketing almost daily crams pleasure suggestions down our throats<br />
and into our subconscious minds. Playing upon dopamine's &quot;aaah,&quot; they tout satisfaction as<br />
why smokers smoke.<br />
The pictures associated with pleasure marketing almost<br />
always depict smokers laughing, looking carefree and having<br />
fun. While the conscious mind may not be noticing them, our<br />
subconscious is always listening.<br />
Pleasure rationalizations sink their teeth into nicotine’s<br />
dopamine high while ignoring the anxieties of nicotine’s low. <br /> <br /><br /> We are true drug addicts. As such, do we seek nicotine’s<br />
high for pleasure or due to chemical obedience, because we<br />
must?<br />
Pleasure? Why are there no marketing ads showing the<br />
serious displeasure that occurs when too much time passes<br />
without tobacco? It is hard to imagine being any more<br />
The Journey Home 59<br />
intellectually dishonest than to teach children and teens that we use nicotine for pleasure.<br />
We do so because we have to, because the displeasure starts hurting when we don’t.<br />
]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:35:22 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=54</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=europa" ent:id="europa">europa</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/flavored">flavored</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/hookahs">hookahs</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarettes">cigarettes</category>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lorillard Tobacco Company</title>
<link>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=53</link>
<description><![CDATA[Founded in 1760, Lorillard Tobacco Company is the oldest U.S. tobacco company. Its brands<br />
include Kent, Maverick, Max, Newport, Old Gold, Satin, Triumph and True. The following<br />
telling quotes are from once secret Lorillard documents:<br />
April 13, 1977: “Tobacco scientists know that physiological satisfaction is almost totally<br />
related to nicotine intake.”<br /> November 3, 1977 - “I don't know of any smoker who at some point hasn't wished he<br />
didn’t smoke. If we could offer an acceptable alternative for providing nicotine, I am<br />
100 percent sure we would have a gigantic brand.”<br />
<br />February 13, 1980: “Goal - Determine the minimum level of nicotine that will allow<br />
continued smoking. We hypothesize satisfaction cannot be compensated for by<br />
psychological satisfaction. At this point smokers will quit, or return to higher tar &amp;nicotine brands.” <br /><br /> &nbsp;]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:16:49 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buycigarettes</dc:creator>
<trackback:ping>http://buycigarettes.blogg.de/trackback.php?id=53</trackback:ping>
<ent:cloud ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/blogg.opml">
<ent:topic ent:href="http://www.blogg.de/?category=shopping" ent:id="shopping">shopping</ent:topic>
</ent:cloud>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/lorillard">lorillard</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/tobacco">tobacco</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/company">company</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/nicotine">nicotine</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/quit">quit</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/smoking">smoking</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/addictions">addictions</category>
<category domain="http://www.blogg.de/tag/cigarette">cigarette</category>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
